Comparison

Palydin vs payment claim tools

Payment claim tools help submit a claim or issue a schedule. Palydin connects the claim to the contract record behind it: contract scope, claim period, prior assessment, retention, GST, variations, SOPA payment schedule context, documents, and audit history.

Palydin contract overview showing revised value, progress, health signals, and claim position
The contract overview proves the point: the claim sits inside a wider commercial record.

Comparison matrix

Compare the workflow, not just the feature list.

WorkflowExcel / claim-only toolsPalydin
Progress claimsGood at preparing and sending the claim artifact.Connected

Connects the claim to contract scope, claim period, prior assessments, retention, GST, and history.

VariationsOften handled outside the claim tool or only shown as a value line.Connected

Keeps variation background, costs, status, and claim impact connected.

RetentionUsually a calculation inside the claim, not a release workflow.Connected

Tracks deductions, held amounts, portions, and release context.

SOPA datesMay show claim dates without the broader assessment record.Connected

Keeps payment schedule timing beside claim context, assessment reasons, and audit history.

Contract documentsNormally separate from claim preparation.Connected

Lets teams ask contract-cited questions against uploaded documents.

Audit historyFocused on submission status and claim events.Connected

Covers claims, variations, retention, compliance, and contract decisions.

Both-side collaborationCan still leave assessors rebuilding the context in another system.Connected

Gives subcontractors, head contractors, and principals controlled access to the same contract record.

Where the old tool breaks

The failure point is the record behind the claim.

Claim-only tools can make submission easier while leaving the contract basis somewhere else.

Variation status, retention position, and compliance context still need separate checking.

The assessor needs more than the claim total: they need the record behind the claim.

Why Palydin is different

Payment claim tools stop at the claim

Some tools help you send a claim. Big project systems try to manage the whole job. Palydin sits between them: it keeps claims, claim periods, prior assessments, variations, retention, GST, compliance, SOPA payment schedule context, documents, and audit history in one place.

Product

Not a decoration. The screen shows the argument.

The point of Palydin is visible in the product surface: the claim and the contract record around it stay connected.

Palydin contract overview showing revised value, progress, health signals, and claim position
The contract overview proves the point: the claim sits inside a wider commercial record.

FAQ

Direct answers for search visitors.

Start with one contract

Verify the workflow before you talk to sales.

Start the Pro trial, load one contract, draft a real workflow, and decide from the product surface.