The Ontology Layer for Construction Finance
Model every contract as a structured ontology. Both parties operate against the same model — scope, progress, forecasts, compliance, and payment derived from a single source of truth across your entire portfolio.
The Problem
Contracts live in spreadsheets. Claims in emails. Variations in PDFs. The financial state of a construction project is scattered across tools that were never designed to connect.
Every claim period, teams rebuild the financial state from scratch — manually reconciling cumulative progress, retention, variations, and payments across disconnected documents. Errors compound. Disputes arise. Money moves slowly.
Palydin replaces this with a single, structured ontology.
The Construction Ontology
Objects
The foundational data model mirrors the contract itself — every entity is a first-class object with defined attributes and lifecycle.
Relationships
Objects exist in relation to each other. The ontology encodes these relationships so the system can reason about the contract as a whole.
Actions
Every mutation is a defined operation against the model — auditable, reversible, and consistent with the contract state.
Platform Capabilities
Scope Definition
Build work breakdown structures with line items, quantities, units, and rates. The WBS is the root of the ontology — every financial operation traces back to it.
Progress Certification
Each claim period captures the complete state of the contract. Progress is cumulative, not incremental — eliminating reconciliation errors and providing auditable history.
Variation Management
Variations are not patches to a spreadsheet. They are structured objects linked to WBS items with their own approval workflows, values, and claim histories.
Financial Intelligence
Net claims, retention, cumulative progress, and contract value are derived from the model in real time. No manual calculations. No version conflicts. One source of truth.
Cost Forecasting
Decompose costs by first principles, allowances, or unit rates. Track actuals against the model. Monte Carlo simulation derives P10–P90 confidence intervals — forecasting as a function of the ontology, not a separate spreadsheet.
Compliance Enforcement
Insurance, licenses, safety certifications — modeled as requirements with defined lifecycles. The ontology enforces compliance as a precondition. Claims cannot be submitted until obligations are satisfied.
Multi-Party Contracts
Upstream and downstream contracts resolve to the same underlying model. Each party operates within scoped access boundaries — seeing their view of a single truth. No document exchange. No reconciliation.
Portfolio Intelligence
Earned value metrics, cash flow projections, assessment erosion, and health scoring — computed from the ontology across your full portfolio. Intelligence that emerges from the model, not reports built on top of it.
From Contract to Payment
Define the ontology. Create the project, build the WBS, register variations. Establish counterparty relationships across upstream and downstream contracts. The model becomes the single source of truth for all downstream operations.
Claim against the model. Each period captures cumulative progress against every WBS item. Snapshots preserve state, enabling auditability across the contract lifecycle.
Model costs from first principles. Encode compliance obligations as system constraints. The ontology enforces preconditions — claims cannot proceed until the model's invariants are satisfied.
Deliver financial truth. Net claims, retention, cumulative positions — derived, not entered. Payment certificates generated directly from the ontology. Certification is a function of the model, not a manual process.
Principles
Claims preserve the complete contract state at the moment of creation. Historical records are immutable — you can always reconstruct the financial position at any point in time.
Values cascade from leaf nodes to parents, computed not entered. The WBS hierarchy ensures that every rolled-up total is mathematically consistent with its components.
Defined once at the contract level, applied consistently across every claim. Compliance is built into the model — not left to manual calculation or memory.
Both counterparties operate against the same model. There is no claimant version and assessor version — there is one ontology, with scoped access. Reconciliation becomes unnecessary.
Obligations are encoded in the model, not tracked in memory. The system enforces compliance as an invariant — claims cannot be submitted until preconditions are satisfied.
Early Access
Define scope. Track progress. Certify payment. One platform. One ontology.